2005 Mechanical Vibration System Driving Through the Dashpot
Now suppose instead that we fix the top of the spring and drive the system by moving the bottom of the dashpot instead.
Suppose that the position of the bottom of the dashpot is given by and the position of the mass is given by , arranged so that when the spring is relaxed. Then the force on the mass is given by since the force exerted by a dashpot is supposed to be proportional to the speed of the piston moving through it. This can be rewritten as
We will consider as the system response, and again on physical grounds we specify as the input signal the position of the back end of the dashpot. Note that the derivative of the input signal (multiplied by ) occurs on the right hand side of the equation.
Again we suppose that the input signal is of sinusoidal form
We will now work out the frequency response analysis of this problem.
First, , so our equation is
We know that the periodic system response will be sinusoidal, and as usual we choose the amplitude-phase form with the cosine function
Since was chosen as the input, the gain is given by .
As usual, we compute the gain and phase lag by making a complex replacement.
Instead we will go back to equation and complexify before taking the derivative of the right-hand-side. Our input becomes and the DE becomes
Since we have ; that is, the sinusoidal system response of is the real part of the exponential system response of . The Exponential Response Formula gives where is the characteristic polynomial.
The complex gain (scale factor that multiplies the input signal to get the output signal) is Thus,
We can write , where . (We use the minus sign so will come out as the phase lag.) Substitute this expression into the formula for to get Taking the real part we have
All that's left is to compute the gain and the phase lag . We have so This gives In computing the phase we have to be careful not to forget the factor of in the numerator of . After a little algebra we get As with the system driven through the spring, we try to find the input frequency which gives the largest system response. In this case we can find without any calculus by using the following shortcut: divide the numerator and denominator in by and rearrange to get Now the gain can be written as Because squares are always positive, this is clearly largest when the term . At this point and , i.e. the resonant frequency is the natural frequency.
Since , we also see that the phase lag is 0 at Thus the input and output sinusoids are in phase at resonance.
We have found interesting and rather surprising results for this dashpot-driven mechanical system, namely, that the resonant frequency occurs at the system's natural undamped frequency ; that this resonance is independent of the damping coefficient ; and that the maximum gain which can be obtained is . We can contrast this with the spring-side driven system worked out in the previous note, where the resonant frequency certainly did depend on the damping coefficient. In fact, there was no resonance at all if the system is too heavily damped. In addition, the gain could, in principle, be arbitarily large.
Comparing these two mechanical systems side-by-side, we can see the importance of the choice of the specification for the input in terms of understanding the resulting behavior of the physical system. In both cases the right-hand side of the DE is a sinusoidal function of the form or , and the resulting mathematical formulas are essentially the same. The key difference lies in the dependence of the constant on either the system parameters and/or the input frequency . It is in fact the dependence of on and in the dashpot-driven case that results in the radically different result for the resonant input frequency .