3002 Table Entries Derivative Rules
-derivative rule
This is a course on differential equations. We should try to compute .
As usual, let . Let be the generalized derivative of . (Recall, this means jumps in produce delta functions in .) The -derivative rule is
Proof: Rule (1) is a simple consequence of the definition of Laplace transform and integration by parts.
The last equality follows from:
1. We assume has exponential order, so if Re is large enough is 0 at .
2. The integral in the second term is none other than the Laplace transform of .
Rule follows by applying rule twice.
Rule Follows by applying rule
times.
Notes: 1. We will call the terms the 'annoying terms'. We will be happiest when our signal has rest initial conditions, so all of the annoying terms are 0.
2. A good way to think of the -derivative rules is
Roughly speaking, Laplace transforms differentiation in to multiplication by .
3. The proof of rule uses integration by parts. This is clearly valid if is continuous at . It is also true (although we won't show this) if is a generalized function. - See example 2 below.
Example 1. Let . We can compute directly and by using rule .
Directly:
Rule :
Example 2. Let be the unit step function, so .
Directly:
Rule :
Example 3. Let . Compute two ways.
Directly:
Rule :
-derivative rule
There is a certain symmetry in our formulas. If derivatives in time lead to multiplication by then multiplication by should lead to derivatives in . This is true, but, as usual, there are small differences in the details of the formulas.
The -derivative rule is
Proof: Rule is a simple consequence of the definition of Laplace transform
Rule is just rule applied times.
Example 4. Use the -derivative rule to find .
Solution. Start with , then . The -derivative rule now says - which we know to be the answer.
Example 5. Use the -derivative rule to find and .
Solution. Start with , then . The -derivative rule now says
Continuing: , , ,
With Laplace, there is often more than one way to compute. We know . Therefore the -shift rule also gives the above formula for .
Repeated Quadratic Factors
Recall the table entries for repeated quadratic factors
Previously we proved these formulas using partial fractions and factoring the denominators on the frequency side into complex linear factors. Let's prove them again using the -derivative rule.
Proof of using the -derivative rule.
Let . We know . The -derivative rule implies
This formula is with the factor of moved from one side to the other.